A Thought Experiment in Life Prolongation: The Tortoise Transformation

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12:645–649 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The value of extending the human lifespan remains a key philosophical debate in bioethics. In building a case against the extension of the species-typical human life, Nicolas Agar considers the prospect of transforming human beings near the end of their lives into Galapagos tortoises, which would then live on decades longer. A central question at stake in this transformation is the persistence of human consciousness as a condition of the value of the transformation. Agar entertains the idea that consciousness could persist in some measure, but he thinks little is to be gained from the transformation because the experiences available to tortoises pale in comparison to those available to human beings. Moreover, he thinks persisting human consciousness and values would degrade over time, being remade by tortoise needs and environment. The value available in the transformation would not, then, make the additional years of life desirable. Agar’s account does not, however, dispose of the tortoise transformation as a defensible preference. Some people might still want this kind of transformation for symbolic reasons, but it would probably be better that no continuing human consciousness persist, since that consciousness would be inexpressible as such. Even so, it is not irrational to prefer various kinds of lifespan extension even if they involve significant modifications to human consciousness and values.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MURATE
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-03-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-04-29

Total views
16 ( #63,824 of 64,115 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #60,432 of 64,115 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.