On the Superiority of Divine Legislation Theory to Divine Command Theory

Faith and Philosophy (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The view that human law can be analyzed in terms of commands was subjected to devastating criticism by H. L. A. Hart in his 1961 The Concept of Law. Two objections that Hart levels against the command theory of law also make serious trouble for divine command theory. Divine command theorists would do well to jettison command as the central concept of their moral theory and, following Hart’s lead, instead appeal to the concept of a rule. Such a successor view—divine legislation theory—has the attractions of divine command theory without the unacceptable limitations of command theories that Hart identifies.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MUROTS-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-08-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-08-01

Total views
102 ( #52,030 of 71,407 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
102 ( #6,822 of 71,407 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.