HPV and the Ethics of CDC’s Vaccination Requirements for Immigrants

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 25 (2):111-132 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The United States may justifiably exclude unvaccinated aliens, perhaps even under the assumption of Open Borders, according to which people should generally be permitted to settle in countries of their choosing. Furthermore, there are good reasons to endorse the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) current vaccination-related exclusion criteria, which were last revised in 2009. I frame my discussion around CDC’s 2008 decision to permit immigrant girls and women to be excluded if they were not vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV)—a decision that was quickly reversed and that led to the 2009 revisions to CDC’s vaccination-related immigrant exclusion criteria.

Author's Profile

Mark Christopher Navin
Oakland University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-07

Downloads
397 (#40,426)

6 months
116 (#29,254)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?