Improving Nonmedical Vaccine Exemption Policies: Three Case Studies

Public Health Ethics 10 (3) (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some communities that exempt parents from vaccine mandates have recently reformed their exemption policies by eliminating nonmedical exemptions, allowing nonmedical exemptions only for parents who object to vaccination for religious reasons, or making exemptions more difficult to obtain. We argue against eliminating nonmedical exemptions because there are weighty moral reasons to offer these exemptions and because eliminating them will likely have unfortunate social and political consequences. We also argue against allowing nonmedical exemptions only for parents who object to vaccination for religious reasons, on the grounds that doing so is likely to be unfair or ineffective. We conclude that nonmedical exemptions should be available to people who object for both religious and secular reasons, and that the best way to decrease exemption rates is to make the application process more burdensome. We illustrate our arguments with examples of recent policy changes in three US states.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NAVINV
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-03-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-02-14

Total downloads
280 ( #9,125 of 37,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
92 ( #3,492 of 37,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.