Abstract

The tendency to be more excluding on account of views and beliefs held has intensified all the more. The proliferation of discussions and forums through social media reflects both the potential and challenges of the Internet as a public sphere. While these platforms foster widespread and immediate engagement, the rise of echo chambers, characterized by selective information sharing and trust disparities, undermines inclusivity and genuine public discourse. This paper examines the tension between echo chambers and the Internet's potential as a public sphere, where individuals can engage in meaningful and rational discussions, specifically those involving relevant socio-political deliberations. Grounded in Jürgen Habermas’s framework, the paper explores the Internet as a communal space that fosters open dialogue, contrasting it with the exclusionary dynamics of echo chambers. By analyzing the essential features of echo chambers within the context of the 2022 Philippine National Elections, the paper situates this phenomenon in the broader socio-epistemological landscape. It demonstrates how the Internet embodies the characteristics of a public sphere while addressing its challenges. Ultimately, this paper argues that echo chambers are antithetical to the democratic nature of the Internet, emphasizing the need for digital spaces that promote inclusive and critical engagement.