Can we describe possible circumstances in which we would have most reason to believe that time is two-dimensional?

Ratio 17 (1):68–83 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that no one has yet successfully managed to describe possible circumstances in which it would be correct to say that we have most reason to believe that time is two-dimensional. I also argue--using a similar strategy--that Shoemaker's famous case for time without change does not describe possible circumstances in which it would be correct to say that we have most reason to believe that there is time without change.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OPPCWD
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-03-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Time Without Change.Shoemaker, Sydney
Brains and Behavior.Putnam, Hilary
The Philosophy of Time.Le Poidevin, Robin & MacBeath, Murray (eds.)

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
85 ( #22,998 of 37,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #21,881 of 37,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.