The Tristram Shandy Paradox: A Response to David S. Oderberg

Philosophia Christi 4 (2):335-350 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper is a response to David Oderberg's discussion of the Tristram Shandy paradox. I defend the claim that the Tristram Shandy paradox does not support the claim that it is impossible that the past is infinite.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-03-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
318 ( #8,246 of 38,056 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #6,822 of 38,056 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.