A Critical Evaluation of Rea’s Response to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In an important discussion of the problem of hiddenness, Michael Rea briefly presents and defends an argument from divine hiddenness which he thinks encapsulates the problem of divine hiddenness, and then develops a detailed and nuanced response to this argument. Importantly, Rea claims that his response does not depend on the commonly held theistic view that God allows hiddenness to secure human goods. In this paper I offer a detailed criticism of Rea’s account of what justifies God in allowing divine hiddenness, arguing that Rea’s response to the argument from divine hiddenness is unsuccessful.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PARACE-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-03-10

Total views
893 ( #6,029 of 65,664 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
234 ( #1,968 of 65,664 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.