Explanatory Failures of Relative Realism

Epistemologia 38 (1):16-28 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Scientific realism (Putnam 1975; Psillos 1999) and relative realism (Mizrahi 2013) claim that successful scientific theories are approximately true and comparatively true, respectively. A theory is approximately true if and only if it is close to the truth. A theory is comparatively true if and only if it is closer to the truth than its competitors are. I argue that relative realism is more skeptical about the claims of science than it initially appears to be and that it can explain neither the success nor the failure of science. Hence, it is not a promising competitor to scientific realism.
Reprint years
2015
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PAREFO-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2017-03-26)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-05-28

Total views
199 ( #22,157 of 51,669 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #16,171 of 51,669 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.