The Anti-Induction for Scientific Realism

Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (3):329-342 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In contemporary philosophy of science, the no-miracles argument and the pessimistic induction are regarded as the strongest arguments for and against scientific realism, respectively. In this paper, I construct a new argument for scientific realism which I call the anti-induction for scientific realism. It holds that, since past theories were false, present theories are true. I provide an example from the history of science to show that anti-inductions sometimes work in science. The anti-induction for scientific realism has several advantages over the no-miracles argument as a positive argument for scientific realism.
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PARTAF-3
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-11-01
Latest version: 5 (2018-08-10)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-11-01

Total views
329 ( #16,077 of 55,809 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #11,357 of 55,809 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.