The Moral Epistemological Argument for Atheism

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (1):121--142 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Numerous supposed immoral mandates and commands by God found in religious texts are introduced and discussed. Such passages are used to construct a logical contradiction contention that is called the moral epistemological argument. It is shown how there is a contradiction in that God is omnibenevolent, God can instruct human beings, and God at times provides us with unethical orders and laws. Given the existence of the contradiction, it is argued that an omnibenevolent God does not exist. Finally, this contention is defended from several objections.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-10

Downloads
1,029 (#11,639)

6 months
215 (#10,896)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?