Interpreting the claim of Legitimate Authority: an analysis of Joseph Raz's objection against incorporating moral norms into law

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
From a critical review of the literature, we analyze the incompatibility between the possibility of incorporating moral principles to the law and its authoritative nature, as argued by exclusive positivists, such as J. Raz. After presenting his argument in second section, we argue in the third section that it is incompatible with commonly accepted (even by Raz) premises of the theory of legal interpretation, or else it would lead to contradiction - unless one presupposes, within the premises, a strong version of the sources thesis (which is what Raz intends to prove). In conclusion, we return to the arguments presented,
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PERITC-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-03-08
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-03-08

Total views
53 ( #47,374 of 55,861 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #27,334 of 55,861 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.