On the pragmatic and epistemic virtues of inference to the best explanation

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a series of papers over the past twenty years, and in a new book, Igor Douven has argued that Bayesians are too quick to reject versions of inference to the best explanation or abduction that cannot be accommodated within their framework. In this paper, I survey Douven’s worries and bring to bear a series of pragmatic and purely epistemic arguments to show that Bayes’ Rule really is the only correct way to respond to your evidence.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PETOTP-9
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-10-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-10-16

Total views
46 ( #46,320 of 53,568 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #13,987 of 53,568 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.