Frege and saving substitution

Philosophical Studies 178 (8):2687-2697 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Goodman and Lederman (2020) argue that the traditional Fregean strategy for preserving the validity of Leibniz’s Law of substitution fails when confronted with apparent counterexamples involving proper names embedded under propositional attitude verbs. We argue, on the contrary, that the Fregean strategy succeeds and that Goodman and Lederman’s argument misfires.

Author Profiles

Brian Rabern
University of Edinburgh
Bryan Pickel
University of Glasgow

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-18

Downloads
703 (#19,406)

6 months
122 (#24,852)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?