Why is an Egg Donor a Genetic Parent, but not a Mitochondrial Donor?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (3):488-498 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What’s the basis for considering an egg donor a genetic parent but not a mitochondrial donor? I will argue that a closer look at the biological facts will not give us an answer to this question because the process by which one becomes a genetic parent, i.e., the process of reproduction, is not a concept that can be settled by looking. It is, rather, a concept in need of philosophical attention. The details of my argument will rest on recent developments in biological technology, but the persuasiveness of my argument will turn on the history of another biological concept, death. Given some important similarities between the two concepts, the way in which ‘death’ evolved in the recent past can provide guidance on how we should think about ‘reproduction.’

Author's Profile

Monika Piotrowska
State University of New York, Albany

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-11

Downloads
706 (#20,205)

6 months
105 (#34,357)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?