# The Narrow Ontic Counterfactual Account of Distinctively Mathematical Explanation

*British Journal for the Philosophy of Science*:axz008 (2019)

**Abstract**

An account of distinctively mathematical explanation (DME) should satisfy three desiderata: it should account for the modal import of some DMEs; it should distinguish uses of mathematics in explanation that are distinctively mathematical from those that are not (Baron [2016]); and it should also account for the directionality of DMEs (Craver and Povich [2017]). Baronâ€™s (forthcoming) deductive-mathematical account, because it is modelled on the deductive-nomological account, is unlikely to satisfy these desiderata. I provide a counterfactual account of DME, the Narrow Ontic Counterfactual Account (NOCA), that can satisfy all three desiderata. NOCA appeals to ontic considerations to account for explanatory asymmetry and ground the relevant counterfactuals. NOCA provides a unification of the causal and the non-causal, the ontic and the modal, by identifying a common core that all explanations share and in virtue of which they are explanatory.

**Keywords**

**Categories**

(categorize this paper)

**PhilPapers/Archive ID**

POVTNO

**Upload history**

Archival date: 2019-02-22

View other versions

View other versions

**Added to PP index**

2019-02-22

**Total views**

144 ( #29,485 of 53,633 )

**Recent downloads (6 months)**

31 ( #21,691 of 53,633 )

How can I increase my downloads?

**Downloads since first upload**

*This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.*