# The Narrow Ontic Counterfactual Account of Distinctively Mathematical Explanation

*British Journal for the Philosophy of Science*:axz008 (2019)

**Abstract**

An account of distinctively mathematical explanation (DME) should satisfy three desiderata: it should account for the modal import of some DMEs; it should distinguish uses of mathematics in explanation that are distinctively mathematical from those that are not (Baron [2016]); and it should also account for the directionality of DMEs (Craver and Povich [2017]). Baronâ€™s (forthcoming) deductive-mathematical account, because it is modelled on the deductive-nomological account, is unlikely to satisfy these desiderata. I provide a counterfactual account of DME, the Narrow Ontic Counterfactual Account (NOCA), that can satisfy all three desiderata. NOCA appeals to ontic considerations to account for explanatory asymmetry and ground the relevant counterfactuals. NOCA provides a unification of the causal and the non-causal, the ontic and the modal, by identifying a common core that all explanations share and in virtue of which they are explanatory.

**Keywords**

**Categories**

(categorize this paper)

**PhilPapers/Archive ID**

POVTNO

**Revision history**

Archival date: 2019-02-22

View upload history

View upload history

References found in this work BETA

Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation.Strevens, Michael

New Work for a Theory of Universals.Lewis, David

Making Things Happen. A Theory of Causal Explanation.Woodward, James

Counterfactuals.Lewis, D.

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

**Added to PP index**

2019-02-22

**Total views**

63 ( #32,433 of 43,016 )

**Recent downloads (6 months)**

25 ( #24,345 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

**Downloads since first upload**

*This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.*