Gender as a divine attribute

Religious Studies 52 (1):97-115 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is standard within the Christian tradition to characterize God in predominantly masculine terms. Let ‘traditionalism’ refer to the view that this pattern of characterization is theologically mandatory. In this article, I seek to undercut the main motivations for traditionalism by showing that it is not more accurate to characterize God as masculine rather than feminine (or vice versa). The novelty of my argument lies in the fact that it presupposes neither theological anti-realism nor a robust doctrine of divine transcendence, but instead rests heavy theoretical weight on the imago Dei doctrine and the method of perfect-being theology. The article closes by examining the implications of the article's main argument for the moral and liturgical propriety of characterizing God in predominantly masculine terms.
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
REAGAA
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-01-30
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-08-27

Total views
625 ( #9,952 of 65,656 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
51 ( #16,497 of 65,656 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.