The Landscape and the Multiverse: What’s the Problem?

Synthese 1:1-23 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
As a candidate theory of quantum gravity, the popularity of string theory has waxed and waned over the past four decades. One current source of scepticism is that the theory can be used to derive, depending upon the input geometrical assumptions that one makes, a vast range of different quantum field theories, giving rise to the so-called landscape problem. One apparent way to address the landscape problem is to posit the existence of a multiverse; this, however, has in turn drawn heightened attention to questions regarding the empirical testability and predictivity of string theory. We argue first that the landscape problem relies on dubious assumptions and does not motivate a multiverse hypothesis. Nevertheless, we then show that the multiverse hypothesis is scientifically legitimate and could be coupled to string theory for other empirical reasons. Looking at various cosmological approaches, we offer an empirical criterion to assess the scientific status of multiverse hypotheses.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
REATLA-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-03-22
Latest version: 3 (2021-04-19)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-03-22

Total views
216 ( #29,474 of 64,225 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
72 ( #9,530 of 64,225 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.