Religious exclusivism unlimited

Religious Studies 47 (4):449 - 463 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Like David Silver before them, Erik Baldwin and Michael Thune argue that the facts of religious pluralism present an insurmountable challenge to the rationality of basic exclusive religious belief as construed by Reformed Epistemology.I will show that their argument is unsuccessful. First, their claim that the facts of religious pluralism make it necessary for the religious exclusivist to support her exclusive beliefs with significant reasons is one that the reformed epistemologist has the resources to reject. Secondly, they fail to demonstrate that it is impossible for basic religious beliefs to return to their properly basic state after defeaters against them have been defeated. Finally, I consider whether there is perhaps a similar but better argument in the neighbourhood and conclude in the negative. Reformed Epistemology's defence of exclusivism thus remains undefeated
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-01-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Ethical Intuitionism.Huemer, Michael
Principia Ethica.Moore, G. E.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
702 ( #2,991 of 39,699 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
311 ( #1,024 of 39,699 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.