Physicalism and Supervenience: A Case for a New Sense of Physical Duplication

Erkenntnis 81 (4):669-681 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Physicalism is the view, roughly, that everything is physical. This thesis is often characterized in terms of a particular supervenience thesis. Central to this thesis is the idea of physical duplication. I argue that the standard way of understanding physical duplication leads—along with other claims—to a sub-optimal consequence for the physicalist. I block this consequence by shifting to an alternative sense of physical duplication. I then argue that physicalism is best characterized by a supervenience thesis that employs both the new sense of physical duplication and a new class of possible worlds.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROCPAS-3
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2016-08-04)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Exclusion Again.Bennett, Karen
Supervenience.McLaughlin, Brian

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-08-26

Total downloads
125 ( #18,474 of 37,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #19,915 of 37,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.