Why we should stop using animal-derived products on patients without their consent

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Medicines and medical devices containing animal-derived ingredients are frequently used on patients without their informed consent, despite a significant proportion of patients wanting to know if an animal-derived product is going to be used in their care. Here, I outline three arguments for why this practice is wrong. Firstly, I argue that using animal-derived medical products on patients without their informed consent undermines respect for their autonomy. Secondly, it risks causing non-trivial psychological harm. Thirdly, it is morally inconsistent to respect patients' dietary preferences and then use animal-derived medicines or medical devices on them without their informed consent. I then address several anticipated objections, and conclude that the continued failure to address this issue is an ethical blind spot that warrants applying the principles of respect for autonomy and informed consent consistently.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-05-15
Latest version: 2 (2021-06-08)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
149 ( #38,926 of 65,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
90 ( #7,616 of 65,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.