Simulation trouble and gender trouble

Philosophical Explorations 27 (2):171-183 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is it impossible to imaginatively simulate what it’s like to be someone with a different gender experience – to understand them empathically? Or is it simply difficult, a challenge requiring effort and dedication? I first distinguish three different sorts of obstacle to empathic understanding that are sometimes discussed: Missing Ingredient problems, Awkward Combination Problems, and Inappropriate Background Problems. I then argue that, although all three should be taken seriously, there is no clear reason to think that any of them are both genuinely intractable and also significant impediments to the kind of empathic understanding we might want. To that extent, the challenge to interpersonal understanding here may be more a matter of skill and work than a hard boundary.

Author's Profile

Luke Roelofs
University of Texas at Arlington

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-07

Downloads
80 (#100,008)

6 months
58 (#88,266)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?