Logical Principles of Agnosticism

Erkenntnis 84 (6):1263-1283 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Logic arguably plays a role in the normativity of reasoning. In particular, there are plausible norms of belief/disbelief whose antecedents are constituted by claims about what follows from what. But is logic also relevant to the normativity of agnostic attitudes? The question here is whether logical entailment also puts constraints on what kinds of things one can suspend judgment about. In this paper I address that question and I give a positive answer to it. In particular, I advance two logical norms of agnosticism, where the first one allows us to assess situations in which the subject is agnostic about the conclusion of a valid argument and the second one allows us to assess situations in which the subject is agnostic about one of the premises of a valid argument.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-06-06
Latest version: 2 (2018-06-11)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Laws and Symmetry.van Fraassen, Bas C.
Accuracy, Coherence, and Evidence.Fitelson, Branden & Easwaran, Kenny
Suspended Judgment.Friedman, Jane

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
177 ( #19,772 of 44,292 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #7,966 of 44,292 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.