Contingency and Necessity

The Monist 97 (1):86-103 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper argues that the problem of how to act in the face of radical contingency is of central importance in Musil’s novel and intimately connected to what Musil calls the sense of possibility. There is a variety of different strategies by which individuals, and the state of Kakania as a whole, deal with contingency, and they all involve a claim to a kind of grounding or necessity; for example, the Parallel Campaign is one big attempt to ground Kakania in what can be perceived as a form of metaphysical necessity. With the figure of Ulrich, Musil radicalizes the problem by showing the consequences of viewing even the relationship one has to one’s own self as contingent – the ultimate outcome of which is self-alienation.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SATCAN
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-01-16

Total views
116 ( #20,772 of 38,996 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #33,713 of 38,996 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.