Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind

Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (2):65-72 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Usage of the term ‘theory of mind’ (ToM) has exploded across fields ranging from developmental psychology to social neuroscience and psychiatry research. However, its meaning is often vague and inconsistent, its biologi- cal bases are a subject of debate, and the methods used to study it are highly heterogeneous. Most crucially, its original definition does not permit easy downward translation to more basic processes such as those stud- ied by behavioral neuroscience, leaving the interpreta- tion of neuroimaging results opaque. We argue for a reformulation of ToM through a systematic two-stage approach, beginning with a deconstruction of the con- struct into a comprehensive set of basic component processes, followed by a complementary reconstruction from which a scientifically tractable concept of ToM can be recovered.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?Premack, David & Woodruff, G.
Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?Premack, David & Woodruff, Guy

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Outcome Knowledge and False Belief.Ghrear, Siba E.; Birch, Susan A. J. & Bernstein, Daniel M.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
51 ( #38,161 of 45,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #26,784 of 45,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.