Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind

Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (2):65-72 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Usage of the term ‘theory of mind’ (ToM) has exploded across fields ranging from developmental psychology to social neuroscience and psychiatry research. However, its meaning is often vague and inconsistent, its biologi- cal bases are a subject of debate, and the methods used to study it are highly heterogeneous. Most crucially, its original definition does not permit easy downward translation to more basic processes such as those stud- ied by behavioral neuroscience, leaving the interpreta- tion of neuroimaging results opaque. We argue for a reformulation of ToM through a systematic two-stage approach, beginning with a deconstruction of the con- struct into a comprehensive set of basic component processes, followed by a complementary reconstruction from which a scientifically tractable concept of ToM can be recovered.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?Premack, David & Woodruff, G.
Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?Premack, David & Woodruff, Guy

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Unification at the Cost of Realism and Precision.Brown, Rachael L.; Brusse, Carl; Huebner, Bryce & Pain, Ross
Theory of Mind, Pragmatics and the Brain.Enrici, Ivan; Bara, Bruno G. & Adenzato, Mauro

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
59 ( #40,386 of 50,414 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #42,124 of 50,414 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.