Similarity-based cognition: radical enactivism meets cognitive neuroscience

Synthese:1-19 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Similarity-based cognition is commonplace. It occurs whenever an agent or system exploits the similarities that hold between two or more items—e.g., events, processes, objects, and so on—in order to perform some cognitive task. This kind of cognition is of special interest to cognitive neuroscientists. This paper explicates how similarity-based cognition can be understood through the lens of radical enactivism and why doing so has advantages over its representationalist rival, which posits the existence of structural representations or S-representations. Specifically, it is argued that there are problems both with accounting for the content of S-representations and with understanding how neurally-based structural similarities can work as representations in guiding intelligent behavior. Finally, with these clarifications in place, it is revealed how radical enactivism can commit to an account of similarity-based cognition in its understanding of neurodynamics.
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SEGSCR-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-12-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-12-11

Total views
75 ( #37,992 of 51,671 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #11,283 of 51,671 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.