Abstract

This paper expounds a philosophical approach aimed at the reconsideration of the relationship of human beings to nature, via Naess, who remains one of the interlocutors in the field of environmental ethics and founder of Deep Ecology. The tortuous pathway human-nature relations communication is explained, showing how ancient civilizations, Greeks included, recognised nature with respect and understood it as a harmonious and interrelated order. Yet with the emergence of Cartesian dualism at the dawn of modernity, nature becomes objectified, which piles on a utilitarian view concealing anthropocentrism. This droves humankind farther away from nature. Underlying this change, which created a context in which the present fraying exists, was industrialization itself, along with the relevant technological advance and the final commodification of nature, with a utilitarian orientation where human interests took precedent over ecological integrity. This disconnect is the reason for putting together a paper with a philosophical and practical reorientation around Naess’s deep ecology. His ideas of “Self-realization,” “Biocentric Equality,” and “Ecological Wisdom” show ways forward for rebalancing things by letting people understand that they aren’t special compared to other beings in nature. People can only act to solve ecological degradation and fulfil existentially by adopting Naess’s ecocentric vision with a rebirth for an understanding of where they belong within the web we call life. More importantly, this research emphasizes how Naess’s deep ecological approach opens doors to empowering society ideologically toward living more sustainable and ethically ahead, with future generations of ecological health and human well-being Synergistics. Keywords: Biocentric Equality, Deep Ecology, Ecological Wisdom, Human-Nature Relationship, Self-Realization.