Chance and the Dissipation of our Acts’ Effects

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (2):334-348 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
ABSTRACT If the future is highly sensitive to the past, then many of our acts have long-term consequences whose significance well exceeds that of their foreseeable short-term consequences. According to an influential argument by James Lenman, we should think that the future is highly sensitive to acts that affect people’s identities. However, given the assumption that chancy events are ubiquitous, the effects that our acts have are likely to dissipate over a short span of time. The sets of possible futures left open by alternative acts are typically very similar in the same way that large random samples drawn from the same population are typically very similar.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-05-16
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
69 ( #53,571 of 65,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #46,360 of 65,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.