Phenomenologism vs fundamentalism: The case of superconductivity

CURRENT SCIENCE, 94 (10):1256-1264 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that phenomenological treatment of physical problems is more powerful than fundamental treatment. Developments in the field of superconductivity present us with a clear example of such superiority. The BCS (Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer) was accepted as the fundamental theory of superconductivity for a long time. Nevertheless, Landau and Ginzburg phenomenological model has so far proven to be a more fruitful theoretical representation to understand and to predict the features of superconductivity and superconductive materials.

Author's Profile

Towfic Shomar
University Of Jordan

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-12

Downloads
295 (#52,763)

6 months
57 (#68,867)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?