Responsibility Without Identity

The Harvard Review of Philosophy 18 (1):109-132 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Many people believe that for someone to now be responsible for some past action, the agent of that action and the responsible agent now must be one and the same person. In other words, many people that moral responsibility presupposes numerical personal identity. In this paper, I show why this platitude is false. I then suggest an account of what actual metaphysical relationship moral responsibility presupposes instead.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-02
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
421 ( #15,648 of 2,454,449 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #20,698 of 2,454,449 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.