In Defense of Hypothetical Syllogism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Moti Mizrahi (2013) presented a putative counterexample to Hypothetical Syllogism (HS) for indicative conditionals aiming to succeed where previous attempts to refute HS have failed. Lee Walters (2014a) objected that Mizrahi’s putative counterexample results from an inadequate analysis of conditionals with embedded modals, but advanced new putative counterexamples to HS for subjunctive conditionals that are supposed to bypass this issue (Walters, 2014a; 2014b). It is argued that Walter’s analysis of embedded modals is unnecessary to prevent Mizrahi’s putative counterexample, since the example can be disarmed either as a fallacy of equivocation or as a contextual fallacy. Walters’s putative counterexamples to HS are also criticized as contextual fallacies. The conclusion is that neither Mizrahi nor Walters provided compelling reasons to reject HS.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SILIDO-6
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-01-30
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-01-30

Total views
48 ( #49,476 of 56,903 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #26,794 of 56,903 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.