In defense of Bacon

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (2):192-215 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Feminist science critics, in particular Sandra Harding, Carolyn Merchant, and Evelyn Fox Keller, claim that misogynous sexual metaphors played an important role in the rise of modern science. The writings of Francis Bacon have been singled out as an especially egregious instance of the use of misogynous metaphors in scientific philosophy. This paper offers a defense of Bacon.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
8,649 (#446)

6 months
436 (#3,610)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?