What Physical Properties Are

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):201-225 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper concerns the question of how to specify what is to count as physical for the purposes of debates concerning either physicalism or the completeness of physics. I argue that what is needed from an account of the physical depends primarily on the particular issue at stake, and that the demand for a general a priori specification of the physical is misplaced. A number of attempts to say what should be counted as physical are defended from recent attacks by Chris Daly, and a specific proposal due to David Papineau developed and extended. I argue that this approach is more than suitable for the debates for which it is intended.
No keywords specified (fix it)
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Can Mathematical Objects Be Causally Efficacious?Seungbae Park - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (3):247–255.
Physicalism.Tiehen, Justin

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #33,546 of 40,684 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #14,785 of 40,684 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.