A Preference Semantics for Imperatives

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Imperative sentences like Dance! do not seem to represent the world. Recent modal analyses challenge this idea, but its intuitive and historical appeal remain strong. This paper presents three new challenges for a non-representational analysis, showing that the obstacles facing it are even steeper than previously appreciated. I will argue that the only way for the non-representationalist to meet these three challenges is to adopt a dynamic semantics. Such a dynamic semantics is proposed here: imperatives introduce preferences between alternatives. This characterization of meaning focuses on what function a sentence serves in discourse, rather than what that sentence refers to (e.g. a state of the world). By representing the meaning of imperatives, connectives and declaratives in a common dynamic format, the challenges posed for non-representationalism are met.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2016-07-07)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 88 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
805 ( #3,135 of 43,981 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
94 ( #5,616 of 43,981 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.