Accuracy and Epistemic Conservatism

Analysis:any094 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Epistemic utility theory (EUT) is generally coupled with \emph{veritism}. Veritism is the view that truth is the sole fundamental epistemic value. Veritism, when paired with EUT, entails a methodological commitment: Norms of epistemic rationality are justified only if they can be derived from considerations of accuracy alone. According to EUT, then, believing truly has epistemic value, while believing falsely has epistemic disvalue. This raises the question as to how the rational believer should balance the prospect of true belief against the risk of error. A strong intuitive case can be made for a kind of epistemic \emph{conservatism}---that we should disvalue error more than we value true belief. I argue that none of the ways in which advocates of veritist EUT have sought to motivate conservatism can be squared with their methodological commitments. Short of any such justification, they must therefore either abandon their most central methodological principle or else adopt a permissive line with respect to epistemic risk.
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
STEAAE-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-12-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Suspended Judgment.Friedman, Jane
Accuracy, Coherence, and Evidence.Fitelson, Branden & Easwaran, Kenny

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-12-15

Total downloads
82 ( #23,410 of 37,188 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #3,994 of 37,188 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.