Against Essential Mental Normativity Again

Dialogue 50 (2):333-346 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper (2008), I presented two arguments against the thesis that intentional states are essentially normative. In this paper, I defend those arguments from two recent responses, one from Nick Zangwill in his (2010), and one from Daniel Laurier in the present volume, and offer improvements of my arguments in light of Laurier’s criticism.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-15

Downloads
744 (#17,980)

6 months
86 (#42,915)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?