“Population” Is Not a Natural Kind of Kinds

Biological Theory 5 (2):154-160 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Millstein (2009) argues against conceptual pluralism with respect to the definition of “population,” and proposes her own definition of the term. I challenge both Millstein's negative arguments against conceptual pluralism and her positive proposal for a singular definition of population. The concept of population, I argue, does not refer to a natural kind; populations are constructs of biologists variably defined by contexts of inquiry.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
271 ( #19,521 of 56,114 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #22,727 of 56,114 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.