What seemings seem to be

Episteme 12 (3):363-384 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to Phenomenal Conservatism (PC), if it seems to a subject S that P, S thereby has some degree of (defeasible) justification for believing P. But what is it for P to seem true? Answering this question is vital for assessing what role (if any) such states can play. Many have appeared to adopt a kind of non-reductionism that construes seemings as intentional states which cannot be reduced to more familiar mental states like beliefs or sensations. In this paper I aim to show that reductive accounts need to be taken more seriously by illustrating the plausibility of identifying seemings and conscious inclinations to form a belief. I briefly close the paper by considering the implications such an analysis might have for views such as PC.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Interpreting Intuitions.McGahhey, Marcus & Van Leeuwen, Neil
Seemings as Sui Generis.McAllister, Blake

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
297 ( #15,098 of 50,086 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #32,938 of 50,086 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.