Doomed to fail: the sad epistemological fate

In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological proofs today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 413-422 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For beings like us, no ontological argument can possibly succeed. They are doomed to fail. The point of an ontological argument is to enable nonempirical knowledge of its conclusion, namely, that God exists. But no ontological argument could possibly enable us to know its conclusion nonempirically, and so must fail in that sense

Author's Profile

John Turri
University of Waterloo

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-21

Downloads
165 (#73,810)

6 months
43 (#81,898)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?