Drawing the boundaries of animal sentience

Animal Sentience 13 (29) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We welcome Mikhalevich & Powell’s (2020) (M&P) call for a more “‘inclusive”’ animal ethics, but we think their proposed shift toward a moral framework that privileges false positives over false negatives will require radically revising the paradigm assumption in animal research: that there is a clear line to be drawn between sentient beings that are part of our moral community and nonsentient beings that are not.

Author Profiles

Bryce Huebner
Georgetown University
Walter Veit
University of Reading

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-28

Downloads
374 (#39,429)

6 months
66 (#57,804)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?