Drawing the boundaries of animal sentience

Animal Sentience 13 (29) (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We welcome Mikhalevich & Powell’s (2020) (M&P) call for a more “‘inclusive”’ animal ethics, but we think their proposed shift toward a moral framework that privileges false positives over false negatives will require radically revising the paradigm assumption in animal research: that there is a clear line to be drawn between sentient beings that are part of our moral community and nonsentient beings that are not.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VEIDTB
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-06-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Fish and Microchips: On Fish Pain and Multiple Realization.Matthias Michel - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (9):2411-2428.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2020-06-28

Total views
46 ( #43,224 of 50,406 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #12,786 of 50,406 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.