Chomskyan Arguments Against Truth-Conditional Semantics Based on Variability and Co-predication

Erkenntnis 86 (4):919-940 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I try to show that semantics can explain word-to-world relations and that sentences can have meanings that determine truth-conditions. Critics like Chomsky typically maintain that only speakers denote, i.e., only speakers, by using words in one way or another, represent entities or events in the world. However, according to their view, individual acts of denotations are not explained just by virtue of speakers’ semantic knowledge. Against this view, I will hold that, in the typical cases considered, semantic knowledge can account for the denotational uses of words of individual speakers.

Author's Profile

Agustin Vicente
University of the Basque Country

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-29

Downloads
663 (#21,044)

6 months
93 (#38,462)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?