Search Engines, Free Speech Coverage, and the Limits of Analogical Reasoning

In Susan Brison & Katharine Gelber (eds.), Free Speech in the Digital Age. pp. 33-41 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper investigates whether search engines and other new modes of online communication should be covered by free speech principles. It criticizes the analogical reason-ing that contemporary American courts and scholars have used to liken search engines to newspapers, and to extend free speech coverage to them based on that likeness. There are dissimilarities between search engines and newspapers that undermine the key analogy, and also rival analogies that can be drawn which don’t recommend free speech protection for search engines. Partly on these bases, we argue that an analogical approach to questions of free speech coverage is of limited use in this context. Credible verdicts about how free speech principles should apply to new modes of online com-munication require us to re-excavate the normative foundations of free speech. This method for deciding free speech coverage suggests that only a subset of search engine outputs and similar online communication should receive special protection against government regulation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WHISEF-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-03-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2020-03-18

Total views
22 ( #45,913 of 47,154 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #31,420 of 47,154 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.