Consequentialism and the Death Penalty

American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):56-58 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Comment on "The ethical 'elephant' in the death penalty 'room'". Arguments in defense of the death penalty typically fall into one of two groups. Consequentialist arguments point out beneficial aspects of capital punishment, normally focusing on deterrence, while non-consequentialist arguments seek to justify execution independently of its effects, for example, by appealing to the concept of retribution. Michael Keane's target article "The ethical 'elephant' in the death penalty 'room'" should, we believe, be read as an interesting new consequentialist defense of physician involvement in capital punishment.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-07
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
2,198 ( #1,943 of 72,589 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
259 ( #1,625 of 72,589 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.