Consequentialism and the Death Penalty

American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):56-58 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Comment on "The ethical 'elephant' in the death penalty 'room'". Arguments in defense of the death penalty typically fall into one of two groups. Consequentialist arguments point out beneficial aspects of capital punishment, normally focusing on deterrence, while non-consequentialist arguments seek to justify execution independently of its effects, for example, by appealing to the concept of retribution. Michael Keane's target article "The ethical 'elephant' in the death penalty 'room'" should, we believe, be read as an interesting new consequentialist defense of physician involvement in capital punishment.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WILCAT-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-07
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-09-14

Total views
1,433 ( #2,713 of 2,444,733 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
404 ( #932 of 2,444,733 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.