May I Treat A Collective As A Mere Means

American Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):273-284 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to Kant, it is impermissible to treat humanity as a mere means. If we accept Kant's equation of humanity with rational agency, and are literalists about ascriptions of agency to collectives it appears to follow that we may not treat collectives as mere means. On most standard accounts of what it is to treat something as a means this conclusion seems highly implausible. I conclude that we are faced with a range of options. One would be to rethink the equation of humanity with rationality. Another would be to abandon the prohibition on treating as a means. The last would be to abandon literalist construals of attribution of agency to collectives
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WRIMIT-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Corporate Crocodile Tears? On the Reactive Attitudes of Corporate Agents.Gunnar Björnsson & Kendy Hess - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2):273–298.
Kantian Group Agency.MacArthur, Amy L.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-12-31

Total downloads
448 ( #4,859 of 36,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #9,219 of 36,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.