The Many Uses of Predicates of Taste and the Challenge from Disagreement

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 46 (1):79-101 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the debate between contextualism and relativism about predicates of taste, the challenge from disagreement (the objection that contextualism cannot account for disagreement in ordinary exchanges involving such predicates) has played a central role. This paper investigates one way of answering the challenge consisting on appeal to certain, less focused on, uses of predicates of taste. It argues that the said thread is unsatisfactory, in that it downplays certain exchanges that constitute the core disagreement data. Additionally, several arguments to the effect that the exchanges in question don’t amount to disagreement are considered and rejected.

Author's Profile

Dan Zeman
University of Warsaw

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-19

Downloads
614 (#23,384)

6 months
95 (#37,304)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?