Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Visual experiences in the blind induced by an auditory sensory substitution device.Jamie Ward & Peter Meijer - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):492-500.
    In this report, the phenomenology of two blind users of a sensory substitution device – “The vOICe” – that converts visual images to auditory signals is described. The users both report detailed visual phenomenology that developed within months of immersive use and has continued to evolve over a period of years. This visual phenomenology, although triggered through use of The vOICe, is likely to depend not only on online visualization of the auditory signal but also on the users’ previous (albeit (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • How well do you see what you hear? The acuity of visual-to-auditory sensory substitution.Alastair Haigh, David J. Brown, Peter Meijer & Michael J. Proulx - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4.
    Sensory substitution devices (SSDs) aim to compensate for the loss of a sensory modality, typically vision, by converting information from the lost modality into stimuli in a remaining modality. “The vOICe” is a visual-to-auditory SSD which encodes images taken by a camera worn by the user into “soundscapes” such that experienced users can extract information about their surroundings. Here we investigated how much detail was resolvable during the early induction stages by testing the acuity of blindfolded sighted, naïve vOICe users. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Effects of some variations in auditory input upon visual choice reaction time.Ira H. Bernstein & Barry A. Edelstein - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (2):241.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations