Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Did Kuhn kill logical empiricism?George A. Reisch - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (2):264-277.
    In the light of two unpublished letters from Carnap to Kuhn, this essay examines the relationship between Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Carnap's philosophical views. Contrary to the common wisdom that Kuhn's book refuted logical empiricism, it argues that Carnap's views of revolutionary scientific change are rather similar to those detailed by Kuhn. This serves both to explain Carnap's appreciation of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and to suggest that logical empiricism, insofar as that program rested on Carnap's (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   57 citations  
  • Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1206 citations  
  • Was Carnap entirely wrong, after all?Howard Stein - 1992 - Synthese 93 (1-2):275-295.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis.Moritz Schlick - 1934 - Erkenntnis 4 (1):79-99.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  • Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. V. O. Quine - 1951 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 202-220.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   917 citations  
  • Carnap and Incommensurability.Stathis Psillos - 2008 - Philosophical Inquiry 30 (1-2):135-156.
    Relatively recent work on Carnap, based on his published papers and books as well as on his unpublished correspondence and other material, has suggested that Carnap and Kuhn might not have been miles apart when it comes to the issue of theory-change. Two prevailing thoughts are that a) Kuhnian ‘paradigms’ might be taken to be very similar to Carnapian ‘linguistic frameworks’ and b) Kuhnian ‘ incommensurability ’ between competing paradigms is consonant with Carnap’s thesis that when a linguistic framework is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Logical positivism.J. A. Passmore - 1943 - Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 21 (2-3):65-92.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Logical Positivism.J. A. Passmore - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (1):58-58.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Protokollsätze.Otto Neurath - 1932 - Erkenntnis 3 (1):204-214.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   91 citations  
  • Confirmation holism and semantic holism.Mack Harrell - 1996 - Synthese 109 (1):63-101.
    Fodor and Lepore, in their recent book "Holism," maintain that if an inference from semantic anatomism to semantic holism is allowed, certain fairly deleterious consequences follow. In Section 1 Fodor and Lepore's terminology is construed and amended where necessary with the result that the aforementioned deleterious consequences are neither so apparent nor straightforward as they had suggested. In Section 2 their "Argument A" is considered in some detail. In Section 3 their "argument attributed to Quine" is examined at length and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism.P. K. Feyerabend - 1967 - Critica 1 (2):103-106.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   233 citations