Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Mill Versus Paternalism.Richard J. Arneson - 1979 - Philosophy Research Archives 5:89-119.
    This paper attempts a defense of John Stuart Mill’s absolute ban against paternalistic restrictions on liberty. Mill’s principle looks more credible once we recognize that some instances of what are thought to be justified instances of paternalism are not instances of paternalism at all—e.g. anti-duelling laws. An interpretation of Mill’s argument is advanced which stresses his commitment to autonomy and his suggestion that exactly the same reasons which favor absolute freedom of speech also favor an absolute prohibition of paternalism. Alternative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Men in Groups: Collective Responsibility for Rape.Larry May & Robert Strikwerda - 1994 - Hypatia 9 (2):134 - 151.
    We criticize the following views: only the rapist is responsible since only he committed the act; no one is responsible since rape is a biological response to stimuli; everyone is responsible since men and women contribute to the rape culture; and patriarchy is responsible but no person or group. We then argue that, in some societies, men are collectively responsible for rape since most benefit from rape and most are similar to the rapist.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Mill Versus Paternalism.Richard J. Arneson - 1980 - Ethics 90 (4):470-489.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  • Paternalism and Respect for Autonomy.Danny Scoccia - 1990 - Ethics 100 (2):318-334.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Preferences and Politics.Cass R. Sunstein - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (1):3-34.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations