Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Priorities in health care: reply to Lewis and Charny.David Lamb - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (1):33-34.
    This paper is a reply to proposals to base priority health-care decisions on public opinion surveys. Whilst it is recognised that current practice is less than satisfactory, it is argued here that basing health-care priorities on societal attitudes in this way is not a solution and does not provide a satisfactory basis for bringing democracy to the health service.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Which of two individuals do you treat when only their ages are different and you can't treat both?P. A. Lewis & M. Charny - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (1):28-34.
    A relative value of life dependent on age has been produced from a survey of 721 randomly selected individuals together with other observations of professional practice. The results are presented in diagrammatic form. If two identical people, except for age, present for medical treatment for a life-threatening condition and only one can be treated then the diagram indicates what the choice should be.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Resource allocation: a plea for a touch of realism.P. Whitaker - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (3):129-131.
    The problem of resource allocation in health has stimulated much thought and research, in attempts to provide objective, rational methods by which necessary choices can be made. One such method was proposed in a paper in this journal. The authors argued for a utilitarian approach, which they claimed to demonstrate was acceptable to society at large. This paper argues that the evidence supporting such a claim was flawed; such a utilitarian approach is not socially acceptable, and is therefore not relevant. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations