Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Ethics of Predatory Journals.Alexander McLeod, Arline Savage & Mark G. Simkin - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 153 (1):121-131.
    Predatory journals operate as vanity presses, typically charging large submission or publication fees and requiring little peer review. The consequences of such journals are wide reaching, affecting the integrity of the legitimate journals they attempt to imitate, the reputations of the departments, colleges, and universities of their contributors, the actions of accreditation bodies, the reputations of their authors, and perhaps even the generosity of academic benefactors. Using a stakeholder analysis, our study of predatory journals suggests that most stakeholders gain little (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Do You Ignore Information Security in Your Journal Website?Mehdi Dadkhah, Glenn Borchardt & Mohammad Lagzian - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (4):1227-1231.
    Nowadays, web-based applications extend to all businesses due to their advantages and easy usability. The most important issue in web-based applications is security. Due to their advantages, most academic journals are now using these applications, with papers being submitted and published through their websites. As these websites are resources for knowledge, information security is primary for maintaining their integrity. In this opinion piece, we point out vulnerabilities in certain websites and introduce the potential for future threats. We intend to present (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics.Stefan Eriksson & Gert Helgesson - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (2):163-170.
    This paper describes and discusses the phenomenon ‘predatory publishing’, in relation to both academic journals and books, and suggests a list of characteristics by which to identify predatory journals. It also raises the question whether traditional publishing houses have accompanied rogue publishers upon this path. It is noted that bioethics as a discipline does not stand unaffected by this trend. Towards the end of the paper it is discussed what can and should be done to eliminate or reduce the effects (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • A purely predatory relationship… Really?Andrew Moore - 2016 - Bioessays 38 (9):813-813.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Scholarly Black Market.Shahryar Sorooshian - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (2):623-624.
    Fake and unethical publishers’ activities are known by most of the readers of Science and Engineering Ethics. This letter tries to draw the readers’ attention to the hidden side of some of these publishers’ business. Here the black market of scholarly articles, which negatively affects the validity and reliability of research in higher education, as well as science and engineering, will be introduced.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Conference Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing.Shahryar Sorooshian - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (6):1805-1806.
    In some cases, organizing a conference resembles a high-profit business. Some of these conferences are wolves in sheep’s clothing. This article draws readers’ attention to current examples of such unethical business conferences.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations